Monday, November 4, 2024

Why Trump Won

Beyond the people who always vote Republican, Trump won because his flagrant flaws could not win over enough people to vote Democratic because of their flagrant flaws.  The appeal of Trump to many voters is well articulated in this WSJ 2020 opinion piece.  The gist: “This is the voice of the resistance on the right. This sentiment has been building for decades. Its scale is suggested by the degree of Trump outrages these voters have been willing to discount on behalf of a larger cultural and political cause. What exactly is their problem? In our time, it takes the form of the left’s cultural triumphalism on matters of identity, race, gender and indeed assimilation, or “the American idea.” Basically, they think we are arrogant, condescending jerks who do not consider them or care about them.  

To me, below are the central reasons Trump won.

Economic issues:

  1. It was the Republicans to win as the party in power was being punished throughout Europe for inflation related to covid supply chain collapse and stimulus spending. I don't think that is fair or rational, but it's true.

  2. Harris failed to say what she was for clearly and didn't defend Biden's economic policy, when it was quite defensible. Many believed that inflation was Biden's fault, which Kamala didn't even touch. Personally, I do not believe it was primarily his fault, and Biden did great compared to other leaders, but she didn't even make the argument.

  3. She didn't criticize Biden's border policy at all, though it is the number two issue (after inflation) with voters. While she has endorsed his late-to-the-table reforms and the Congressional bill that Trump torpedoed, she needed to say he was wrong in his approach from the beginning, and she would not follow that path. She did say the latter, but she had to say the former.

  4. Crime “reforms” of Democrats that have led to a decrease in prosecutions and an increase in retail crime in some localities. Plus Democratic states/cities not being able to make a dent in homelessness despite a flood of money to do so. Obviously, there is nuance in this area but the perception is - with reason - that Democrats have been worse about solving the issue. And the numbers say so. Together, New York and California have 250,000 homeless people out of 58 million people; Texas and Florida together have 54,000 homeless people out of 53 million.

“Woke” issues. They are all connected in a new dogma.  Democrats are generally on board or tolerant of the new dogma; Trump is completely against it (and like the right in general, not in a nuanced way.)

  1. Democrats going all-in for identity politics instead of for keeping the focus on the poor and working class across all demographic lines. This ended up pushing out, particularly, white men but also, to a degree, white women. (Think about that obnoxious "Karen" slur directed to white women.)

  2. Democrats support of DEI, in which diversity only includes BIPOC groups , equity means equality of outcome, not opportunity and inclusion means inclusion of the same "diverse" groups - and specifically excludes Jews. Plus it doesn't work as done. 

  3. The rising anti-Semitism, particularly among youth, in which there is a double-standard seen, particularly, at the Universities. When protestors break the law and policy at colleges protesting the war, they are met with kid gloves. When someone says something racist, homophobic or transphobic, the response is met with quick and consequential condemnation. 

  4. The narrative of decolonization and the oppressor/oppressed plus the white people bad/brown people good narrative. The best example of this is the non-sensical criticism of Israel via the “decolonizing” lens and “white oppressor” lens. I am not commenting on the actual conduct of the war. I believe these attacks are incoherent on the face of it in that half of the country's population is "brown" and the only homeland they ever had was Israel. 

  5.  Click this link on how many gay people feel about gender ideology. Some specifics problems with this the gender movement:

  • Supporting - even over the objections of parents - youth gender transition in spite of the lack of scientific evidence that it is a sound practice and the fact that youth cannot reasonably consent to interventions that can or will lead to sterilization for females and inability to orgasm. When a person detranstitions, they are given no support and, in fact, attacked. A couple of left-leaning groups have sprung up to ring the alarm, but Democrats aren't listening (so far!) The groups are DIAG and LGBT Courage Coalition 

  • Supporting anti-female policies of Title IX revisions to, effectively, change the point of the act from protecting women based on sex to gender, which, perversely ends up hurting females. (It won't survive Supreme Court scrutiny.)

  • Supporting homophobic and misogynistic policies of pushing trans ideology, which is attempting to erase sex and put gender in its place. (So, practically, there are no longer female spaces and kids who are most likely gay are being talked into changing sex.)

  • Supporting policies that encourage schools to lie to parents about their child's gender transition. And supporting anti-parent and family policies of creating "sanctuary states" for gender-confused kids due to the bans on all youth gender care in red states. Neither policy is right to my mind, but encouraging the breaking up of families has absolutely turned many Democrats to the right.

“Nanny State” issues 

  1. The perception that Democrats were too rigid in dealing with Covid, particularly in terms of school closures. Plus that they tried to suppress the speech of those who didn't agree with the CDC. Plus they tried to shame (or force) people into getting vaccines, even after it was clear getting the vaccine was unrelated to the transmission of the virus.

  2. Biden's administration attempt to suppress “disinformation”, but it was always politically coded - disinformation was always on the right to the administration.

  3. Obviously, the revoking of parental rights in trans matters is a major “nanny state” issue. Particularly egregious is teaching kids at a young age about gender as per gender theory (overthrowing the primacy of the sex binary for the gender “spectrum”).   Since the theory is not accepted by majority of people in the US, it amounts to indoctrination by a special interest group in America and is completely anti-pluralistic.  The same could be said about the troubling ethnic studies movement, which is trying to instill the anti-Western civilization and anti-Israel (anti-Semitic as well) post-colonial, oppressor/oppressed narrative to young kids. 

I voted for Kamala because of the unique danger of Trump, but unless Democrats make a real break with woke ideology, there is a good chance I won't vote Democratic in 2028. I am a liberal. I believe in equal opportunity for all. I believe in free speech. I believe in diversity and inclusion of all. I believe we should help those in need. I believe that we should support the working class. I believe in pluralism. I believe in democracy. Basically, I believe in Martin Luther King's vision of America. But the current far left does not believe in these things (except helping people in need, though I am not sure that extends to the white poor who are pro-Trump, but it might).  And Democrats haven't broken with the far left. We need to reject them, isolate them, and get our party back on the right path. Here's hoping.

17 comments:

Anonymous said...

I agree with every word of this.

Anonymous said...

Excellent.

Anonymous said...

I am impressed with much of your insight and respect your courage in stating it clearly.

Anonymous said...

How is it that the far left doesn’t believe in DEI, helping those in need, allowing free speech, equal opportunity?

ramcduff said...

You know, I almost said that I did think that the far left does want to help people in need, so maybe I should put a comment after that. As for the others, the far left claims that they believe in equality of outcome not opportunity - it's a major tenant; the far left thinks one should stifle so called "hate speech" by large numbers; I didn't say it didn't believe in DEI just that their version is horrible. Feel free to pm me and I will give you links with more info.

Anonymous said...

I agree with a lot of what you have written. I need to re-read your article again as there are a lot of points that you have brought up that I had not considered before. Also do you think there was any hanky panky going on when they counted the votes in the swing states, Laura

ramcduff said...

I have no reason to think that there was a problem in any swing states - most of them have Democratic Sec. of States in any case. Feel free to email or, for that matter, call or we could have a zoom date if you ever want to talk about any of this. (And that goes for any of my friends.)

Anonymous said...

I had it somewhat in addition to Robin. The guy thing with their often low regard for women out of their position in life. ( middle to older guys), Low self -esteem white women, and the race card. By the way Robin, What a Treatis this was and I am keeping a copy of it. (for my writings,"Living In the Obvius." So insightful and brilliant. 2025 might find this also helpful with their spew and see how messed up their Heritage Foundation Writings are to gage on.

ramcduff said...

Why don't you spend some time explaining what was bothering you? I made a whole lot of different points.

arthur n said...

Surprisingly, as someone labeled as a Republican, though I have voted Democratic when appropriate, I agree with you and you identified the overwhelming issues. To these I would add, the public is dumb but not stupid, and the cover-up of Biden's rapidly progressing dementia and physical failure was obvious. The cover-up by The White House, including Harris and all staff, the rigorous failure of WaPO, WsPst, as well as Pelosi and Obama, showed the nation a party that would lie and cover up.... as they did not have the guts to push Biden to agree to what had to be the quid pro quo... you get elected for one term period. When that secret agreement betrayed trust, Joe did what he's always done... take care of himself and his family.
A second point is the focus on Trump as a destroyer of democracy sounded hollow when Biden wanted to expand the Supreme Court to whatever number, the Dems wanted to get rid of the filibuster, stuffing Harris in without any consideration of democratic input, and Waltz is there saying get rid of the Electoral College.
So as professor... 8/10 as a grade. As a political observer. 9.5/10 for stating the truth. Only missing thing I would add... people don't vote for Stupid when it is laughing and cackling like a 16-year-old server at Chucky Cheese

Anonymous said...

This article from the Japan Times is similarly eloquent. I wrote a comment a wile ago but if seems to have vaporized. Arthur N. Seattle
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/commentary/2024/11/12/world/us-voters-to-elites/

ramcduff said...

You are right - I should have included the Biden cover-up as one more reason. I don't think the filibuster is democratic at all - certainly not its history - so I don't think that is not an anti-Democratic thing. But, when the Republicans kill it, the Dems will not be happy! There was democratic input to Harris - she was VP and was the only one who could get his funds. And there was no time. Now, anger at Biden for running at all and for dropping out so late - I am more than there on that!

ramcduff said...

Thanks!

Arthur N said...

I fail to see why, when Pelosi/Obama finally kicked Biden out, they did not require the choice to go to an open convention. There could have been real party platforms by different candidates and the floor vote decide. Instead, Harris was stuffed in. The timing was not too different, and there would at least have been an appearance of democratic progress. As it was, the Convention looked like a game show/ free concert with nothing about political choices and policy priorities. Such indifference to the public confirmed the isolation from reality that her entire campaign demonstrated. Thanks for listening

ramcduff said...

Well, Biden endorsed her - so that was a huge problem. I favored your solution, but it was clear that no one was willing to run against her that could possibly get up to speed fast enough to mount a challenge. People like Witmer, Newsom and everybody who ran in 2020 in the primaries said they wouldn't run. The original mistake was Biden's choice of Kamala for, essentially, affirmation action reasons. But Kamala did make sure no one was entering. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/24/us/politics/kamala-harris-democrats-nomination.html And, then, Donna Brazile and one other key Black Democrat - can't find the WaPo article that describes what happened/ his name - called the head of all the delegations to get them to quickly endorse her. It was a fait accompli once the already selected delegates for Biden - at his request - concurred.

Arthur N said...

And all these factors placed against a backdrop of record inflation and massive impacts on the basics like groceries. It's the economy stupid was a cry from long ago election at Clinton 1, and still applies. As the party in power that created the inflation and its falsehood of the Inflation Reduction Act to balloon federal debt, we are now set for more than the seven lean years prophesied in Old Testament times.

ramcduff said...

As you know, I placed those issues first, but I personally know about 25 women - all lifelong Democrats - that did not vote or, in a few cases, voted for Trump because of generally a combination problems with how the Democrats dealt with Covid, crime/education and trans issues. A much smarter and well informed person than I am, with a much deeper dive into the numbers agrees with my take: https://musaalgharbi.substack.com/p/a-graveyard-of-bad-election-narratives?utm_source=cross-post&publication_id=2244610&post_id=151489437&utm_campaign=414210&isFreemail=false&r=7jeog&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email